<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:40:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Headteachers admit illegally excluding pupils</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/headteachers-admit-illegally-excluding-pupils</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/headteachers-admit-illegally-excluding-pupils#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pupils were informally excluded for months or coerced into changing schools, children's commissioner finds.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headteachers have admitted illegally excluding pupils from school, including one &#8220;extreme&#8221; case in which children in their final GCSE year were sent home at Christmas and told not to return until their exams.</p>
<p>The government should conduct research to identify the full extent of unlawful exclusions, and recommend measures to prevent a &#8220;small proportion&#8221; of schools continuing to act in this way, the report says.</p>
<p> <strong><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/mar/19/headteachers-admit-illegally-excluding-pupils" target="_blank">Click here</a></strong> to read the full article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuition fee concerns deter students</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/tuition-fee-concerns-deter-students</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/tuition-fee-concerns-deter-students#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousands of young people from disadvantaged backgrounds are likely to shun going to university due to a lack of understanding about the new fees system, it is claimed today.



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A report by the Independent Task Force on student finance information concluded that many prospective students have misplaced fears over how tuition fees are paid – a situation it described as a &#8220;national scandal&#8221;. Researchers polled nearly 2,000 young people, 59 per cent of whom said they had little or no understanding of the system, which will see tuition fees rise to up to £9,000 a year from next September. The findings come on the day of a central London march by around 10,000 protesters angry about the new system.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/tuition-fee-concerns-deter-students-6259144.html" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read the full story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do more than listen. Act &#8211; Consultation response to the Family Justice Review undertaken for the Family Justice Council</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/do-more-than-listen-act-consultation-response-to-the-family-justice-review-undertaken-for-the-family-justice-council</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/do-more-than-listen-act-consultation-response-to-the-family-justice-review-undertaken-for-the-family-justice-council#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voice of the Child sub-group asked the Office of the Children’s Commissioner to undertake this consultation with children and young people so that their voices could be heard by the Family Justice Review team as they consider proposed improvements to the family justice system.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This report reflects the views and perspectives of 35 children and young people between the ages of 3 and 17 with recent experience of either public or private law processes. Children with experience of private law processes are those whose parents have been through separation or divorce. We sought to talk with children and young people who had experience of disputes in this context: particularly concerning contact. Children with experience of public law had experience of care proceedings, as a result of protection concerns, and had either been removed from their parent/s and placed in care or had been placed with extended family members. In some instances extended family members had obtained parental responsibility through Family Proceedings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Runaways getting younger, says the Children&#8217;s Society</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/runaways-getting-younger-says-the-childrens-society</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/runaways-getting-younger-says-the-childrens-society#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study by The Children's Society published in 2005 found that one in six young runaways ended up sleeping rough, one in eight begged or stole and one in 12 was hurt or harmed as a direct result of running away.

It says its centres have recently reported seeing younger and runaways - some as young as eight.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Children are running away from home at a younger age, putting themselves at risk, a children&#8217;s charity says.</p>
<p>The Children&#8217;s Society says it is increasingly helping pre-teens who have run away at its centres around the UK.</p>
<p>It says 100,000 children run away from home or care every year and many sleep rough, abuse drink or drugs and face sexual exploitation.</p>
<p>Click here to read the full story: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-14079670">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-14079670</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Justice Review Seeks Input from Children and Young People</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/family-justice-review-seeks-input-from-children-and-young-people</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/family-justice-review-seeks-input-from-children-and-young-people#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Family Justice Review is an on-going examination of the family court system as a whole which is aimed at developing a set of recommendations to address problems within the system such as delays in court proceedings, lack of clarity as to how the system works, and failure to hear and take into the consideration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Family Justice Review is an on-going examination of the family court system as a whole which is aimed at developing a set of recommendations to address problems within the system such as delays in court proceedings, lack of clarity as to how the system works, and failure to hear and take into the consideration the wishes and feelings of children and young people. In March 2011, the Review published its interim report which it is seeking consultation responses to. The Review is committed to including the views of children and young people in its work, and in May 2011 the Young People&#8217;s Guide to the Family Justice Review was released. The Guide is aimed at assisting young people in understanding the Interim Report, and is accompanied by a questionnaire which will enable children and young people to put their views forward to the Family Justice Review panel.</p>
<p>Have you been through the family court system? Would you like to share your views on your experience with the Review panel?</p>
<p>Click <a href="http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_197765.pdf" target="_blank">here</a> for the Young People&#8217;s Guide to the Family Justice Review and <a href="https://survey.euro.confirmit.com/wix4/p679354057.aspx" target="_blank">here</a> for the questionnaire.</p>
<p>The deadline for responses is 23 June and the Review will make its final recommendations in autumn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AS-level maths error: students set impossible question</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/as-level-maths-error-students-set-impossible-question</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/as-level-maths-error-students-set-impossible-question#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An &#8220;unfortunate error&#8221; meant maths students were set a question that was impossible to answer in an AS-level exam.
Just under 6,800 teenagers took the paper &#8211; set by the OCR exam body &#8211; last Thursday.
OCR has apologised, saying it will make sure candidates are not disadvantaged by the mistake.
But some students writing on social networking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An &#8220;unfortunate error&#8221; meant maths students were set a question that was impossible to answer in an AS-level exam.</p>
<p>Just under 6,800 teenagers took the paper &#8211; set by the OCR exam body &#8211; last Thursday.</p>
<p>OCR has apologised, saying it will make sure candidates are not disadvantaged by the mistake.</p>
<p>But some students writing on social networking sites have been calling for the test to be re-run.</p>
<p>The error was in an exam paper taken in 335 schools and other exam centres in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.</p>
<p>Read the full story: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-13627415" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-13627415</a> </p>
<p>Tell us what you think: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawstuff/132527306810762">Facebook page</a></p>
<p><a class="twitter-share-button" href="http://twitter.com/share">Tweet</a><script src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Legal highs&#8217; outstrip attempts at regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/legal-highs-outstrip-attempts-at-regulation</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/legal-highs-outstrip-attempts-at-regulation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 08:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New &#8220;legal highs&#8221; are being made widely available online and in specialised shops at an unprecedented pace, outstripping attempts to control them, the European Union&#8217;s drugs agency has warned.
In a report published jointly with the law enforcement agency Europol, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) says in 2010 the two agencies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New &#8220;legal highs&#8221; are being made widely available online and in specialised shops at an unprecedented pace, outstripping attempts to control them, the European Union&#8217;s drugs agency has warned.</p>
<p>In a report published jointly with the law enforcement agency Europol, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) says in 2010 the two agencies officially noted 41 new psychoactive substances, many of them imitating the effects of ecstasy. Fourteen of them were first identified in Britain.</p>
<p>Read the full story in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/11/legal-highs-outstrip-attempts-regulation">Guardian</a> or tell us what you think on our <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawstuff/132527306810762">Facebook page</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-via="clclawstuff">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Half of schools see budget cuts, survey suggests</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/half-of-schools-see-budget-cuts-survey-suggests</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/half-of-schools-see-budget-cuts-survey-suggests#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 09:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than half the schools in England are facing cuts to their budgets, a survey of heads and deputies suggests.
The poll, of 1,177 school and college leaders, also suggests nearly nine out of 10 are seeing reduced support from local authorities.
Read the full story on BBC News or tell us what you think on our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than half the schools in England are facing cuts to their budgets, a survey of heads and deputies suggests.</p>
<p>The poll, of 1,177 school and college leaders, also suggests nearly nine out of 10 are seeing reduced support from local authorities.</p>
<p>Read the full story on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-13346238">BBC News</a> or tell us what you think on our <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawstuff/132527306810762">Facebook page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richest students to pay for extra places at Britain&#8217;s best universities</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/richest-students-to-pay-for-extra-places-at-britains-best-universities</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/richest-students-to-pay-for-extra-places-at-britains-best-universities#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 08:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teenagers from the wealthiest families would be able to pay for extra places at the most competitive universities under government proposals that could allow institutions to charge some British students the same high fees as overseas undergraduates.
Candidates who take up the extra places would not be eligible for publicly funded loans to pay tuition fees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teenagers from the wealthiest families would be able to pay for extra places at the most competitive universities under government proposals that could allow institutions to charge some British students the same high fees as overseas undergraduates.</p>
<p>Candidates who take up the extra places would not be eligible for publicly funded loans to pay tuition fees or living costs, limiting this option to all but the most privileged households who could pay fees up front.</p>
<p>Read the full story in today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/09/universities-extra-places-richest-students" target="_blank">Guardian</a> or tell us what you think on our <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawstuff/132527306810762" target="_blank">Facebook page</a></p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawstuff.org.uk%2Flatest-news%2Frichest-students-to-pay-for-extra-places-at-britains-best-universities&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=450&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font&amp;height=35" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:35px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-via="clclawstuff">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobcentre staff &#8217;sent guidelines on how to deal with claimants&#8217; suicide threats&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/jobcentre-staff-sent-guidelines-on-how-to-deal-with-claimants-suicide-threats</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/latest-news/jobcentre-staff-sent-guidelines-on-how-to-deal-with-claimants-suicide-threats#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 08:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawstuff.org.uk/?p=1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Staff working for jobcentres and other Department for Work and Pensions contractors have been given guidelines on how to deal with suicide threats from claimants as the squeeze on benefits takes hold.
A document sent to jobcentre staff in April details what it calls a &#8220;new policy for all DWP businesses to help them manage suicide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staff working for jobcentres and other Department for Work and Pensions contractors have been given guidelines on how to deal with suicide threats from claimants as the squeeze on benefits takes hold.</p>
<p>A document sent to jobcentre staff in April details what it calls a &#8220;new policy for all DWP businesses to help them manage suicide and self-harm declarations from customers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Read the full story in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/may/08/jobcentre-staff-guidelines-suicide-threats">Guardian</a> or tell us what you think on our <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawstuff/132527306810762" target="_blank">Facebook page</a></p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawstuff.org.uk%2Flatest-news%2Fjobcentre-staff-sent-guidelines-on-how-to-deal-with-claimants-suicide-threats&amp;send=true&amp;layout=button_count&amp;width=450&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font&amp;height=21" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:21px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-via="clclawstuff">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.lawstuff.org.uk @ 2012-05-17 17:03:19 -->
